Receive Updates:

  

POST ARCHIVE

Archive for March, 2006

Learning 2.0: 2.0 Basics (part 1)

Friday, March 31st, 2006

I have been speaking extensively this past couple of months on the subject of Learning 2.0. It is time to get our weblog here caught up with the ideas presented in my talks. So over the next couple of days I will be writing a series of posts on Learning 2.0. Today I'll start with a set of principles that I call 2.0 Basics. These are the key ideas in the 2.0 world, which I think are most salient for learning. They are:

  • The network as platform
  • The network as palette
  • The social network
  • RSS as the new language, and
  • Aggregators as the new desktop

200603310851

The network as platform: Rather than working alone inside of centralized applications users now access distributed web services that allows them to do things collaboratively. These services include social bookmarking services like del.icio.us, which allows users to independently upload and tag URLs to a server where they can be accessed and shared; and web software services like Basecamp where projects are managed using a web service as opposed to an application on the PC. Web services are easily interconnected through open standards and open application interfaces (APIs). Plugged together, these services can replace more rigid centralized applications and put their power in the hands of the users.

200603310854

The network as palette: There is a paradigm shift underway where people go beyond reading the web to writing, podcasting, re-mixing, and publishing. With blogs and podcasting anybody can document and publish what they know. New kinds aggregators and directories (the podcast area of the iTunes music store is the most robust example of this) allow users to categorize and publish their work. So anybody can be an expert. But it goes further than that. People are free to publish, and the data they publish is then freed from centralized applications and re-organized and re-used and shared by web services that are designed to support specific business processes.



200603310856

The social network: During the past few years, a group of web services shifted from static island-like sites to dynamic connective services. Blogs, wikis, trackback, podcasting, videoblogs, and social networking tools like MySpace and Facebook have been organized under the term “social software.” All of these new services are about links, micro-content, and metadata. They are about interconnecting sets of ideas and people. Blogs are about posts, not pages. These posts or items help organize Web content into clean, crisp chunks (known as items) that have vital metadata associated with them, like the date of publication, authorship, categories and tags. Linking among posts is the connective tissue that makes the web social. Folksonomies–user-defined and generated taxonomies–organize links into social networks. New search services enable mining of these new networks.

200603310911





RSS as the lingua franca: I n the web 2.0 model, you find millions of publishers and thousands of “web services” scanning each new piece of information published. According to the author Steven Johnson, “Information in this new model is analyzed, repackaged, digested, and passed on down to the next link in the chain. It flows.”2 This new information ecology is much more likely to lead to innovation as old problems and new ideas collide. Innovation is recombinant and innovators do their best work bringing together old problems and new solutions, existing technologies and unexpected applications, or different types of technology. The process of re-combination is popularly known by the term “mash-up.” Users with a modest amount of technical skills can determine needs, come up with creative solutions, and then quickly build the required combinations of tools themselves. RSS is important because it is facilitating the development the web 2.0 information ecosystem. RSS has become the language of syndication of content between the all systems on the web. An RSS aggregator or news aggregator will most likely become the new user interface to the Intranet. An aggregator is a type of software that retrieves syndicated web content that is supplied in the form of a web feed (RSS, Atom and other XML formats), that is published by weblogs, podcasts, video blogs, and mainstream mass media websites. The aggregator provides a consolidated view of content in a single browser display or desktop application. RSS is the new pathway for information flow on the web. Users now have better control over what reaches them and how it arrives.

The aggregator as the new desktop: this topic is going to needs its own full post, so I'll reserve it for part 2 of this series of posts.

Web-based Feed Readers: Comparison Chart

Friday, March 31st, 2006

We are currently advocating the desktop feed reader, Blogbridge, because of its support of reading lists and managed feed libraries (coming soon). Blogbridge does not currently have a web-based version of its reader–key if you want to read your feeds on the road and you don't have a laptop or internet connection. Tech Crunch recently did a survey of online or web-based feed readers. Here is a feature comparison chart from the article:

200603310816

Summary from the article: If you are looking purely for performance, Google Reader and FeedLounge are the fastest in our tests. Bloglines and Rojo are the best choice if you are looking for a feature rich application (and Rojo blows Bloglines away on “web 2.0″ type features.

Kathleen Speaks at KM Forum on March 30th

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

Kmf-Optima

I will be speaking tomorrow from 1:30 to 2:15 at the Bostom KM Forum.  My slides for this talk are attached below.  Here is the agenda and registration information:

8:30 - 9:00 Registration and Continental Breakfast


9:00 - 9:15 - Welcome, Lynda Moulton


9:15 - 9:4 Setting the Stage - Larry Chait, Managing Director, Chait and Associates

9:45 - 10:30 Are We Collaborating Yet? - Patti Anklam, Hutchinson Associates (formerly of DEC) 


10:30 - 11:00 Exhibitor Introductions and Break 


11:00 - 11:45 The QuickPlace Story - Liz Beckhardt (formerly of the Lotus' QuickPlace team)


11:45 - 12:30 The Social Side of Making Global Work Collaborative - Donald R. Chand, Professor of CIS, Bentley College 


12:30 - 1:30 Lunch and Exhibits 


1:30 - 2:15 Collaboration 2.0 - Kathleen Gilroy, Founder and CEO, The Otter Group


2:15 - 3:00 Collaboration Rules: “Extreme Collaboration” at Toyota and in Open Source Software - Bob Wolf, Ph.D., Manager, The Boston Consulting Group

3:00 - 3:15 Break


3:15 - 4:00 Tying Things Together - Larry Chait
4:00 - 5:00 Exhibits, Networking 


When: March 30, 8:30 - 5 PM

Where: Bentley College

Cost: $40 (pre-registered); $50 (walk-in)

Details, Directions and Registration Links: http://www.kmforum.org/bentley_events.htm

Registrants will received confirmation and Parking Passes via email on Wednesday

If you have colleagues or know of other lists for organizations that might be interested, please feel free to forward this notice.

From Shayne Wood, CDM Jacksonville

Friday, March 24th, 2006

“The class has been very informative and useful. I've used this resolution plan and we are proceeding to resolve this with our sub from a collaborative approach - So far, it seems to be progressing well and it does not appear as if we are going to have to fire them, so that is good.

Once again, thanks for your input and the class has been very rewarding.”

Preparing for Intranet 2.0

Friday, March 24th, 2006

Here is a pre-print version of a paper on Preparing for Intranet 2.0.

From Nancy Hana-Somers, CDM Carbondale

Friday, March 24th, 2006

“Josh and Aixa:
 
I just wanted to thank both of you for delivering excellent content via telephone conference call technology and MS Live Meeting software.
 
It is obvious you both have invested a significant amount of effort to insure excellent execution of each lesson.
 
The process is clear and I believe it is directly applicable to my role as Project Manager for CDM.”

image001.jpg

Monday, March 20th, 2006

Superb Writing about Web 2.0 and Learning and Teaching

Friday, March 17th, 2006

This morning I found the best piece I’ve read on Web 2.0 and teaching and learning.

http://www.educause.edu/apps/er/erm06/erm0621.asp

It is by Bryan Alexander and is published in the March/April issue of the Educause Review. I highly recommend adding this to the pre-reading for the boot camp.

On delicious and learning:

Pedagogical applications stem from their affordance of collaborative information discovery. For instance, researchers at all levels (students, faculty, staff) can quickly set up a social bookmarking page for their personal and/or professional inquiries. The Penntags project at the University of Pennsylvania (http://tags.library.upenn.edu/) and Harvard’s H2O (http://h2obeta.law.harvard.edu/home.do) are examples. First, they act as an “outboard memory,” a location to store links that might be lost to time, scattered across different browser bookmark settings, or distributed in e-mails, printouts, and Web links. Second, finding people with related interests can magnify one’s work by learning from others or by leading to new collaborations. Third, the practice of user-created tagging can offer new perspectives on one’s research, as clusters of tags reveal patterns (or absences) not immediately visible by examining one of several URLs. Fourth, the ability to create multi-authored bookmark pages can be useful for team projects, as each member can upload resources discovered, no matter their location or timing. Tagging can then surface individual perspectives within the collective. Fifth, following a bookmark site gives insights into the owner’s (or owners’) research, which could play well in a classroom setting as an instructor tracks students’ progress. Students, in turn, can learn from their professor’s discoveries.

On search, blogs, linking:

Web 2.0 therefore supports queries for information and reflections on current events of all sorts. Given bloggers’ propensity for linking, not to mention some services’ ability to search links, blogs and other platforms readily lead the searcher to further sources. Students can search the blogosphere for political commentary, current cultural items, public developments in science, business news, and so on.

The ability to save and share a search, and in the case of PubSub, to literally search the future, lets students and faculty follow a search over time, perhaps across a span of weeks in a semester. As the live content changes, tools like Waypath’s topic stream, BlogPulse’s trend visualizations, or DayPop’s word generator let a student analyze how a story, topic, idea, or discussion changes over time. Furthermore, the social nature of these tools means that collaboration between classes, departments, campuses, or regions is easily supported. One could imagine faculty and students across the United States following, for example, the career of an Islamic feminist or the outcome of a genomic patent and discussing the issue through these and other Web 2.0 tools. Such a collaboration could, in turn, be discovered, followed, and perhaps joined by students and faculty around the world. Extending the image, one can imagine such a social research object becoming a learning object or an alternative to courseware.

The notes are a superb bibliography:

. Tim O’Reilly, “What Is Web 2.0,” September 30, 2005, tim.oreilly.com, <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html>.

2. Stephen O’Hear, “Seconds Out, Round Two,” The Guardian, November 15, 2005, <http://education.guardian.co.uk/elearning/story/0,10577,1642281,00.html>.

3. See <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AJAX>. See also Janice Fraser, “It’s a Whole New Internet,” Adaptive Path, April 21, 2005, <http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000430.php>.

4. Arnaud Leene, “Web 2.0 Checklist 2.0,” MicroContent Musings, July 21, 2005, <http://www.sivas.com/microcontent/musings/blog/web_20_checklist_20/>.

5. For examples, see the following: the BBC “What People Are Saying in England” display, <http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/england/TSP>; Casey Bisson’s library experiment, <http://www.plymouth.edu/library/prototype/clusteredopac.php?srchtype=X&k=sociology+of+education>; a Washington Post headline cloud, <http://www.revsys.com/newscloud/>; or TagCloud.com’s samples, <http://www.tagcloud.com/index.php>.

6. Clay Shirky, “Ontology Is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags,” Clay Shirky’s Writings about the Internet, <http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html>.

7. Noted first by Hans Kullin in his Media Culpa blog, <http://www.kullin.net/arkiv/2006_02_01_mc.html#113999533755894760>.

8. See also EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, “Seven Things You Should Know about Social Bookmarking,” May 2005, <http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7001.pdf>.

9. A good survey from early 2005 is Tony Hammond, Timo Hannay, Ben Lund, and Joanna Scott, “Social Bookmarking Tools: A General Review,” D-Lib Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4 (April 2005), <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html>.

10. Usenet discussions from 1981 on are archived at <http://groups.google.com/>.

11. Brian Lamb, “Wide Open Spaces: Wikis, Ready or Not,” EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 39, no. 5 (September/October 2004): 36–48, <http://www.educause.edu/pub/er/erm04/erm0452.asp>.

12. Laura Blankenship, at Bryn Mawr College, discovered and tested this out:

<http://www.brynmawr.edu/etc/etcblog/2005/09/word-processing-on-web.html>.

13. One of the best surveys to date is “For the Vox Populi: A Comparison of How Some Blog Aggregation and RSS Search Tools Work,” post by Mary Hodder on Napsterization.org, July 24, 2005, <http://napsterization.org/stories/archives/000500.html>.

14. See Dan Gillmor’s excellent We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People (Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Media, 2004) for background: <http://wethemedia.oreilly.com/>.

15. “MobileGlu Brings Web Content to Cell Phones,” Engadget Mobile, February 20, 2006, <http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/20/mobileglu-brings-web-content-to-cellphones/>.

16. Cory Doctorow, “Does Web 2.0=AOL 1.0?,” presentation at the Web 2.0 Conference, October 7, 2004, San Francisco, California, <http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail321.html>.



17. “Japan Newspaper Wins Damages for Online Use of Headlines,” October 6, 2005, TODAYonline.com, <http://www.todayonline.com/articles/76678.asp>.

18. See Top Ten Sources, <http://www.toptensources.com/toptensources/home.aspx>, and discussion at MetaFilter, January 2006, <http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/48389>.

19. Lawrence Lessig, The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World (New York: Random House, 2001); J. D. Lasica, Darknet: Hollywood’s War against the Digital Generation (Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2005).

20. Barbara Ganley, “More Thoughts on Teaching and Learning: Lessons Learned,” bgblogging, Middlebury College, December 14, 2005, <http://mt.middlebury.edu/middblogs/ganley/bgblogging/010545.html>.



21. Stephen Downes, “E-learning 2.0,” eLearnMagazine, October 17, 2005,

<http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1>.

Great Resource on Copyright Law

Thursday, March 16th, 2006

Thanks to Otter Advisory Board member, Mari Badger, for sending us this wonderful graphic book on copyright law from Duke's Center for the Study of Public Domain.

200603161731

To access the full text of the book, click here.

Next Public Talk on March 30

Tuesday, March 14th, 2006

I will be giving a public talk on Collaboration 2.0 on March 30th at Bentley College as part of the Boston Knowledge Management Forum. You can read a description of the talk by clicking on the image below. To register, please go here.

Collaboration 2.0


Close
E-mail It